QLP.COM |
||||
Quality Logo Products Inc. represented by Law Firm Golan & Christie loses its UDRP
case in an attempt to unfairly grab 14 year old QLP.com domain name. |
||||
|
||||
Richard G. Lyon, WIPO Panelist stated : "We owe it to this Respondent (Get On The Web Ltd) to chastise the Complainant (Quality Logo Products Inc.) and its representative (Law Firm Golan & Christie) for their irresponsible conduct. We owe it to the integrity of the UDRP process to call out patent abuses such as I believe this case to be." |
||||
Quality Logo Products Inc (Bret Bonnet and Michael Wenger) represented by Anita J. Pancholi and Beverly A. Berneman of Chicago based Law Firm Golan & Christie had their complaint denied by WIPO the World Intellectual Property Organisation. Get on the Web Limited was represented by John Berryhill. According to Linkedin Anita Pancholi left Golan & Christie to work as an attorney at the Chicago office of Law Firm Seyfarth Shaw LLP. In 2019, Anita Pancholi moved on again and is now Associate General Counsel at Nielson in Chicago. The WIPO ruling on the case (Quality Logo Products Inc v Get on the Web Ltd) can be found at WIPO Case No.: D2013-1691 See Domain Sherpa interview with John Berryhill which discusses the Quality Logo Products Inc v Get on the Web Ltd UDRP case "Do Not Abuse the UDRP as Your “Plan B” for Acquiring a Domain Name" |
||||
Richard G. Lyon, panelist's concluding paragraph sums up by saying: "The filing of this groundless Complaint has put the Respondent to considerable time and expense, including payment of the necessary fee for a three-member panel. We owe it to this Respondent to chastise the Complainant and its representative for their irresponsible conduct. We owe it to the integrity of the UDRP process to call out patent abuses such as I believe this case to be." So why did one panelist find Reverse Domain Name Hijacking but the other two (Presiding Panelist Jonas Gulliksson of law firm AdvokatbyrĂ„n Gulliksson and Panelist Christopher K. Larus of law firm Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi) didn’t? Why didn’t the other two panelists agree with Lyon?
|
||||
The UDRP case by law firm Golan and Christie representing Quality Logo Products Inc. regarding the 14 year old QLP.com domain name (registered and used years before Quality Logo Products even existed) was called a "Groundless Complaint". |
||||
There are news stories about the QLP.com domain name UDRP case on TheDomains.com DomainNameWire.com and DomainNameStrategy.com The QLP.com UDRP case is also mentioned in the CircleID article "The Hidden Perils of Filing a Baseless UDRP Complaint" . Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is defined under the UDRP Rules as "using the UDRP in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name".
|