The UDRP case regarding RVK.COM
|
||||
R.V. Kuhns & Associates, Inc. represented by Tonkon Corp LLP loses UDRP case in its attempt to unfairly grab 14 year old RVK.com domain name. |
||||
|
||||
The WIPO Panelists stated : "Complainant knew that Respondent registered the disputed domain name several months prior to Complainant's claimed date of first use of its mark. Complainant must therefore have been aware that Respondent cannot have registered the disputed domain name in bad faith, since he cannot possibly have known of Complainant's as-yet-nonexistent claim to the mark." | ||||
R.V. Kuhns & Associates, Inc. represented by Portland Oregon based Tonkon Corp LLP had their complaint denied by WIPO the World Intellectual Property Organisation. The WIPO ruling on the case (R.V. Kuhns & Associates, Inc. v. Gregory Ricks / Whois Privacy Corp. / Domain Administrator) can be found at WIPO Case No.: D2014-2041 |
||||
The panelists' concluding paragraph sums up by saying: "the Panel finds that Complainant engaged in Reverse Domain name hijacking;"
|
||||
There are news stories about the RVK.com domain name UDRP case on TheDomains.com "UDRP filed on three letter domain RVK.com" and on DomainNameWire.com "Investment firm RVK engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on RVK.com". There are numerous sources for "Reverse Domain Name Hijacking". Amongst these are RDNH.com and HallOfShame.com (which includes a current list of those found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own). See also Does the UDRP do more harm than good? and The UDRP: A Problem at the Core of the Internet
Back to QLP.com (Quality Logo Products failed UDRP) |